Here’s my summary of the
critical assessment factors
in a job interview, and hence for support in a resume.
In all areas, the best
examples are one where you describe a personal experience (not a
philosophy!). Dramatic examples are
better than routine ones. Situations
with problems, complications, frustration are good—if they illustrate
your ability, or at least a significant learning you took away from it. In general, more recent examples are better
than older ones—but not always so. A mixture
of school-related, work-related, and personal life-related experiences is
powerful. A single experience may
support multiple factors, so re-use where appropriate..
starting activities;
getting others motivated;
going beyond what is required or requested;
“selling” opportunities;
finishing the job;
not quitting early;
overcoming obstacles;
looking for final payoff, result, impact; “ensuring” results
showing “ownership” for results, not just for activities;
assuring that things won’t get dropped or forgotten; measuring results
essentially this is getting others to follow you, without a ‘following’ leadership is only an illusion;
setting a vision and getting it adopted;
organizing work and delegating it to others; using others/outside resources effectively;
competing/campaigning for positions and winning them;
participating in work is good—but don’t confuse teamwork for leadership;
showing a balance of toughness and compassion for those led
oral and written examples;
one-to-one, small, and large audiences;
knowing your audience and adapting your preparation, your presentation;
formal and informal styles;
to peers, subordinates, superiors;
especially look for tough, difficult, challenging situation examples
teamwork, yes; also mentoring; sports, work, academics;
best examples are where there are problems and challenges;
constructive management of conflict situations;
show you’re not a conflict-avoider;
performance across barriers (age, gender, class, race, boss/subordinate, teacher/student) are rich examples;
toughness as well as compromise is important;
examples where you chose to think out-of-the-box, try a new approach, reapply something from a different area, rethink an assumption;
this is a very difficult area for many individuals;
do not confuse it with artistic bent, nor with pure creative genius;
innovation is not the same as invention;
freshness of thinking and approach is key, not complexity or uniqueness, nor being first, nor patentability.
is about making choices based on values;
is about being mature about the world and your capacity;
is not about fitting everything in or juggling;
is not about sorting good things from bad things;
is about not being able to have/do good things…and having to choose;
is best shown around big, important (life) issues, sacrifices
is evidenced by the totality and variety of resources you consider applying to any problem;
shows versatility, ingenuity, practicality, cleverness, timeliness and efficiency in getting “the” answer, “an” answer, or a “good-enough” answer;
within ethical constraints, finding and calling the right person who has an answer and gives it to you is an example of great problem solving;
purchasing answers, copying existing answers, and building your own answer are all various problem solving methods;
school problems usually present a very limiting set of rules for problem solving, business does not;
applying your technical mastery (below) may be a good problem solving method, but it is just one approach
methods, techniques, and tools that you understand and have applied;
textbook approaches, analytic methods, algorithms, software tools, mathematical methods;
mastery means understanding the theory, where it applies, where it doesn’t apply, its power and its limitations, and how to use it (get a result);
the language describing technical mastery areas is very precise…like the language of physical/social science, engineering, finance;
© 2002 Michael E. Doherty